Biology · Communities and Biodiversity

Competition and Niche Partitioning

In this lesson

Take it with you

Essential Question

What happens when two species need the same resources?

Food, water, light, and space are limited, so organisms often compete for them. In this lesson, you’ll learn what a niche is, how competition between species can change populations, and how species can share a habitat by using resources in different ways.

Video lesson coming soon. In the meantime, read through the lesson below.

Niches and Competition

  • Niche: a species’ role in its community
  • Competition: using the same limited resource
  • Intraspecific: within one species
  • Interspecific: between different species
Four cards. Niche: the role of a species, including what it eats, where it lives, and when it is active. Competition: two or more organisms use the same limited resource such as food, light, or space. Within a species is intraspecific competition. Between species is interspecific competition.

A niche is the role a species plays in its community: the resources it uses, where and when it lives and feeds, and how it interacts with other species. Competition happens when organisms need the same resource and the supply is limited. Competition among members of the same species is intraspecific, and competition between different species is interspecific. The more two niches overlap, the stronger the competition is likely to be.

Competitive Exclusion

  • Species with very similar niches compete strongly
  • A small advantage can matter over time
  • The weaker competitor may decline in that habitat
  • Seen in lab experiments such as Gause’s Paramecium
Two line graphs of cells per milliliter against time in days. On the left, species A and species B each grow alone and level off, near 180 and 122. On the right, when grown together, species A rises to about 165 while species B peaks near 38 on day 6 and then falls to 0 by day 16.

In the 1930s, G. F. Gause grew two species of Paramecium in the same container with a limited food supply. Each species grew well alone, but when grown together one species declined while the other kept growing. The graph shows illustrative data modeled on that kind of result. This outcome is called competitive exclusion: when two species compete for the same limiting resource, a small advantage can lead to one species declining in that habitat. It is easiest to see in simple lab conditions. In nature, many factors affect the result, and it often takes a long time.

Resource Partitioning

  • Species may use different parts of a resource
  • Different place, food, or time of activity
  • Less niche overlap means less competition
  • Lets similar species live together
A spruce tree drawn as a triangle with three labeled zones. Species 1 feeds mostly on upper outer branches, species 2 on middle branches near the trunk, and species 3 on the lower branches and trunk.

Similar species can often live in the same area if they use resources differently. This is called resource partitioning. In the 1950s, Robert MacArthur studied several warbler species in spruce trees and found that they spent most of their feeding time in different parts of the tree. Because each species mostly used its own zone, competition between them was likely reduced. Species can also divide a resource by feeding at different times of day or on different kinds of food.

Outcomes of Competition

  • Competition can lower growth of one or both species
  • One species may decline locally
  • Or species can come to use resources differently
  • Outcomes depend on the conditions
Flow chart. Two species use the same resource. Competition reduces growth of one or both, or the niches differ in time, place, or food. As a result, one species may decline or be excluded locally, or the species can share the habitat.

Competition does not always end the same way. If two species use the same resource in the same way, one may decline in that habitat. If their niches differ, even slightly, they may be able to share the habitat. Over long periods, competition can also favor individuals that use slightly different resources, which can make the niches of competing species more different. Environmental conditions matter too, because a change in temperature or food supply can change which species has the advantage.

↑ Back to top


Worked Examples

Try each problem on your own first, then open the solution to check your work.

Example 1: Two Species in One Container

Use the graph. When the two species were grown together, which one was outcompeted? Write a claim, evidence, and reasoning.

Two line graphs of two species of Paramecium. Alone, species A levels off near 180 cells per milliliter and species B near 122. Together, species A rises to about 165 while species B peaks at 38 on day 6 and falls to 0 by day 16.
Show the solution
  1. Read the graph: grown together, species B peaks at 38 cells/mL on day 6 and then falls to 0 by day 16. Species A is at 164 cells/mL on day 14.
  2. Claim: species B was outcompeted by species A in this container.
  3. Evidence: each species grew well alone (A to about 180, B to about 122 cells/mL), but together B fell from 38 to 0 cells/mL while A kept rising.
  4. Reasoning: the species had the same limited food supply. Species A used it better, so B could not keep growing. This fits competitive exclusion in simple lab conditions.
  5. Answer: Species B was outcompeted: it fell from 38 to 0 cells/mL while species A kept growing.

Example 2: A New Warbler Arrives

Use the spruce tree model. A new warbler species arrives that feeds mostly on the middle branches near the trunk, the zone species 2 uses. Predict what might happen and explain with the idea of niche overlap.

A spruce tree drawn as a triangle with three feeding zones: upper outer branches, middle branches near the trunk, and lower branches and trunk, each used mostly by a different species.
Show the solution
  1. Overlap: the new species and species 2 would use the same zone, so their niches overlap strongly.
  2. Competition: the same insects would now be shared between two species, so competition is likely to increase in that zone.
  3. Possible outcomes: one species might decline there, or one or both might shift to different parts of the tree or different foods over time.
  4. Species 1 and 3: they mostly use other zones, so they are likely to be affected less.
  5. Answer: Competition is likely to increase in the middle zone, and species 2 or the newcomer may decline or shift to different resources.

Example 3: How Much Did Species B Decline?

In the graph where both species are grown together, species B peaks at 38 cells/mL on day 6 and is at 5 cells/mL on day 12. What percent decrease is this? Round to the nearest tenth of a percent.

Two line graphs of two species of Paramecium. Together, species B peaks at 38 cells per milliliter on day 6 and is at 5 on day 12.
Show the solution
  1. Change: 38 − 5 = 33 cells/mL.
  2. Percent decrease: change ÷ starting value × 100 = 33 ÷ 38 × 100 = 86.8%.
  3. Answer: 86.8% decrease (33 cells/mL fewer).

↑ Back to top


Practice

Tell competition within a species from competition between species, read population data as evidence, use a model of resource partitioning, and calculate a percent change. Try it on your own first, then check your work with the answer key.

↑ Back to top


Lesson Slides

↑ Back to top


Big Ideas

  • A niche is a species’ role in its community
  • Competition happens when organisms use the same limited resource
  • Strong niche overlap can lead to one species declining locally
  • Resource partitioning lets similar species share a habitat
  • Outcomes depend on conditions and often take time

Back to the essential question: when two species need the same resources, they compete. If their niches overlap strongly, one species may decline in that habitat. If they use resources in different ways, they can often live together. Next, you’ll look at predators, prey, and keystone species.

↑ Back to top


NGSS Alignment

This lesson builds toward these Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) performance expectations:

  • HS-LS2-6: Evaluate the claims, evidence, and reasoning that the complex interactions in ecosystems maintain relatively consistent numbers and types of organisms in stable conditions, but changing conditions may result in a new ecosystem.

Disciplinary core ideas: LS2.A Interdependent Relationships in Ecosystems; LS2.C Ecosystem Dynamics, Functioning, and Resilience

↑ Back to top